This startling new
image of the well-known "Face on Mars" (above) may ultimately be regarded
as one of the most important photographs of the entire Space Program. For,
after almost 30 years of acrid controversy and debate, a "whole new side"
to this perplexing Martian mystery - and the profound social and
scientific questions it continues to present - has now literally dawned
….
The image above is an
enhanced, color close-up created by Keith Laney and the Enterprise Mission
- from a combination of three 2001 Mars Odyssey VIS frames (of the five
simultaneously taken by the Odyssey VIS camera system). The official image
release is JPL/ASU V0 3814003 (below). The five frames - from the near
"IR" end of the visible spectrum, to the "violet" -- were acquired by the
Odyssey spacecraft as it flew over the Cydonia region on October 24, 2002
-- precisely one year (Greenwich time) after Odyssey arrived in Martian orbit.
What makes this color
close-up so remarkable is that, for the first time in over a generation, a
NASA spacecraft acquired multi-spectral images of "the Face" as seen in
morning light - with the illumination coming from the East. What this
unique sun angle has now revealed - a Cydonia view that researchers had
yearned for, but never before had the opportunity to analyze -- is nothing
less than revolutionary …. |
|
 |
For, even casual examination of the Face as seen in this "new
light" (above, top) reveals two new pieces of vital information: 1)
that the eastern side, under even this pre-dawn illumination -- for
whatever reason -- is incredibly reflective; and 2) that, in lowered
contrast images (below) the source of this anomalously "high albedo"
is an inexplicable series (in the natural model) of highly geometric
"panels!" |
|
Even those of us who, for some time now, have interpreted the
weight of evidence in favor of an artificial
origin for this unique Cydonia construct, this new data is
unexpected - nay, startling -- confirmation of our previous
analysis.
The key
parameter that makes this new image so remarkable, is "when" it was
acquired.
If you carefully
examine the "data block" for image V0 3814003 on the Arizona State
University (ASU) THEMIS website (above), you can immediately ascertain
that it was taken by the Odyssey camera "at 4:39 AM," local Martian
time. Further reading of the table reveals that the "phase angle" -
that is, the geometric relationship between the Sun, the Martian
surface directly underneath the spacecraft just east of the Face,
and Odyssey itself - was "90.3 degrees." Since "90 degrees" (for a
spacecraft directly overhead) would indicate the Sun was literally
on the eastern horizon, the slightly greater angle reveals that
actually the sun was 0.3 degrees below the horizon when the image
was acquired (and even slightly lower at the location of Face
itself).
The last line in
the table, "Description: Cydonia - face at night" confirms this
geometry: technically, then, this "Odyssey dawn image" was actually
acquired just before sunrise … with the Sun still hidden below the
Cydonia horizon (below). |
 |
This simple, inarguable geometry makes the astonishing high
brightness of the Face's eastern side - and before the Sun has risen
- extraordinary …. And this, in turn, leads directly to the pivotal
question: just what could make "an average Martian mesa" (to quote
Carl Sagan, from his infamous Parade Magazine "Cydonia hit piece"
many years ago) so incredibly reflective … even in the semi-dark,
pre-dawn twilight of Cydonia?
* *
*
A side-by-side
comparison (below) reveals the true incongruity of such a
brilliant-surfaced object. The official NASA version of the Face
from V03814003 (left) is totally "washed out" on the illuminated
(eastern side) - even though the image was shot before the sun had
risen!; while, in the Enterprise rendition (right), after
considerable effort to lower brightness levels, some surface details
can just be seen beneath the glare.
Again, for this
over saturation of the THEMIS imaging CCDs to have occurred, and
under these really dim lighting conditions, "something" about the
innate reflectivity of this Martian surface feature -- at this
geometry -- must truly be "anomalous." To learn |
|
just how "anomalous," one only need look to spacecraft
surface images of pre-dawn Martian twilight, captured by other
unmanned missions … for instance, the unmanned Viking Landers in
1976 (below) or Pathfinder, in 1997. |
|
In this Viking 1 post-sunset surface view (above), prepared
by former USGS graphic artist Don Davis, note how the sky remains
bright well after the sun sets on Mars (sunset, of course, is merely
the opposite condition to sunrise; therefore a post sunset image is
optically equivalent to a pre-dawn image at the same location and
time) The bluish "afterglow" several degrees above the sunset point
on Mars is due to the unique "forward scattering" properties of the
much thinner Martian atmosphere, which is filled with varying
amounts of finely-divided dust (in the official model) -
preferentially scatteing blue light forward toward the camera ….
The major thing
to note in this image is the Lander wind cover on the Viking nuclear
power generator (light ellipse -- far right): notice that it is just
barely visible in this twilight Mars illumination … even though the
lighting geometry is ideal for so-called "specular reflection" (the
light above the setting sun should be bouncing directly toward the
camera) and … the cover itself is painted brilliant
white!
Yet, as can be
seen, under this illumination this white wind cover is barely
noticeable!
Why, under
identical lighting (below), is the Face- even allowing for the
obviously increased gain settings in the Odyssey camera (to bring
out the darker western side) -- so incredibly bright? And why is
that inexplicably reflective eastern surface also arrayed in those
stark … startlingly geometric … patterns? |
 |
Another pre-dawn image (below), this one from Mars
Pathfinder, reinforces this enigma: an obviously almost
un-illuminated landscape, lit only by the sky, clearly incapable of
presenting such dramatic surface differences as seen in the Odyssey
Cydonia image …. |
 |
But it's a Viking 2 sunrise shot that best illustrates this
major new Cydonia mystery. |
|
As you can see (above), even with the sun actually on the
horizon, the overall illumination of the surface landscape in this
Viking 2 dawn image is extremely dark -- a combination of dust
absorption of sunlight at the horizon, and an extremely thin Martian
atmosphere. |
 |
With the gamma of the same image significantly increased
(above) - equivalent to the gain employed in the Odyssey VIS camera
for the pre-dawn Cydonia image -- the surface rocks and other
features become more visible. But, as is readily apparent, with the
exception of two small foreground objects at the lower right,
brightness extremes presented by the Face are simply not present on
the reddish rocks and boulders strewn across this Martian landscape
- even when directly illuminated by the rising sun!
The exceptions
(below) are in themselves most interesting. It is apparent that
their bright sunward-facing surfaces are from polished, mirror-like
reflections - probably caused by wind blown sand abrading over time
metallic crystal surfaces (or, at least "something" metallic
…). |
 |
The problem with applying this natural explanation to the
Face is simply this:
The specular
reflections from these close-in features viewed by the Viking 2
camera are on the order of "a few square inches"; the surface area
of specular reflections from the Face's eastern side measures
several miles in area …
Further contrast
enhancement and brightness reduction of the Face on image V03814003
(below), seeking to penetrate the last, still overexposed highlights
of this incredibly reflective surface, reveals an astonishing
continuation of the "grid-like geometry" noted earlier. This, in
turn, is strikingly consistent with a critical prediction, regarding
the possibly highly anomalous physical nature of this surface … made
over ten years ago. |
 |
Beginning in the 1992 Edition of "The
Monuments of Mars," we strongly suggested that the Face was NOT
merely "a mesa-carved 'Mount Rushmore' … lying on a level Martian
plain" -- but something "far more interesting."
Mark Carlotto and Mike Stein's unprecedented computerized fractal
work on the original Viking images had strongly indicated by 1990
that "something" about the Face was decidedly "non-fractal" -- i.e.
in one interpretation, it is composed of artificial surface
materials (see below), which are successfully resisting the
relentless efforts of the Martian climate to turn them back to dust.
The bright "Face highlight" of the non-fractal Face image (left)
indicates how much it departs from its far more fractal surroundings
…. |
|
|
|
| |